Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] ffv1: import ffv1.3 support

2012-10-19 Thread Peter B.
Quoting Diego Biurrun : Luca sent another patchset later today. Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:16:32 +0200 Subject: [libav-devel] ffv1.3 support Message-id: <1350641795-28126-1-git-send-email-lu_z...@gentoo.org> Sorry, but that mail only contains the following text: //---

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] ffv1: import ffv1.3 support

2012-10-19 Thread Luca Barbato
On 10/19/2012 02:23 PM, Peter B. wrote: > Sorry, but I've slightly lost track... > > Which patches must now be applied to which code-tree in order to be able > to test ffv1.3 support? This is a monolithic ffv1.3 patch that applies to the current tree. Since in review had been requested the ffv1

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] ffv1: import ffv1.3 support

2012-10-19 Thread Diego Biurrun
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Peter B. wrote: > Sorry, but I've slightly lost track... > > Which patches must now be applied to which code-tree in order to be > able to test ffv1.3 support? > > I've tried applying the following patches to libav's git-head: > > 1) import ffv1.3 suppor

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] ffv1: import ffv1.3 support

2012-10-19 Thread Peter B.
Sorry, but I've slightly lost track... Which patches must now be applied to which code-tree in order to be able to test ffv1.3 support? I've tried applying the following patches to libav's git-head: 1) import ffv1.3 support (Couldn't find any patch labelled "1/3") 2) [PATCH 2/3] ffv1: propag

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] ffv1: import ffv1.3 support

2012-10-19 Thread Luca Barbato
On 10/19/2012 09:36 AM, Kostya Shishkov wrote: > (useless rant: it would be nice to have decoder patch separate from encoder > and both of them apply to different files) I'll make it less useless... lu - doing the extra mile =P ___ libav-devel mailing l

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] ffv1: import ffv1.3 support

2012-10-19 Thread Kostya Shishkov
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 08:57:47AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > Code mainly written by Carl Eugen Hoyos, Michael Niedermayer, Paul B > Mahol. > --- > > Now with fixed encoder as well. (useless rant: it would be nice to have decoder patch separate from encoder and both of them apply to different f