Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote:
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes:
From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com
This removes some code duplication between the 3 different versions,
and aligns brackets in such a way that it is now possible to
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes:
This manner of splitting things is incredibly weird-looking. Instead of
trying to unify these rather different fragments, turning the second
half of the loop into a macro and writing out separate loops, each
calling the macro for the common part,
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote:
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes:
This manner of splitting things is incredibly weird-looking. Instead of
trying to unify these rather different fragments, turning the second
half of the loop into a macro and
From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com
This removes some code duplication between the 3 different versions,
and aligns brackets in such a way that it is now possible to pull
this code through a naive pre-processor that doesn't necessarily have
to be aware of compiler-macros.
---
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes:
From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com
This removes some code duplication between the 3 different versions,
and aligns brackets in such a way that it is now possible to pull
this code through a naive pre-processor that doesn't necessarily have
