On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 1/27/2016 10:16 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> When it is zero? (isn't there a check before to sanitize the time_base ?)
>
> I only see a check for audio.
What happened to this patch?
--
Vittorio
__
On 1/27/2016 10:16 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> When it is zero? (isn't there a check before to sanitize the time_base ?)
I only see a check for audio.
- Derek
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/liba
On 27/01/16 22:15, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> It could accidentally divide by zero if num was zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis
> ---
> libavcodec/utils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/utils.c b/libavcodec/utils.c
> index e06ee66..a3c
On 27/01/16 22:15, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> It could accidentally divide by zero if num was zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis
> ---
> libavcodec/utils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/utils.c b/libavcodec/utils.c
> index e06ee66..a3c
It could accidentally divide by zero if num was zero.
Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis
---
libavcodec/utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/utils.c b/libavcodec/utils.c
index e06ee66..a3cb341 100644
--- a/libavcodec/utils.c
+++ b/libavcodec/utils.c
