Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-29 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/28/2012 05:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-29 Thread Måns Rullgård
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes: Hi, On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/28/2012 05:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ronald S.

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-28 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote: However, the question still remains why it is in generic code. That's hard to say in hindsight, but it seems it was for simplicity so that you

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-28 Thread Luca Barbato
On 07/28/2012 05:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote: However, the question still remains why it is in generic code. That's hard to say in

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-28 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/28/2012 05:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote: However, the question

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-27 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Ronald

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-27 Thread Luca Barbato
On 07/27/2012 06:30 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Martin Storsjö

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-27 Thread Måns Rullgård
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes: Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: On Thu, Jul

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-27 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote: However, the question still remains why it is in generic code. That's hard to say in hindsight, but it seems it was for simplicity so that you don't have to add it to each individual mmx function, thus making the asumption

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-26 Thread Diego Biurrun
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:10:10AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: On 07/26/2012 04:27 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com --- libswscale/swscale.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Ok. No, not OK. This is just a repackaged

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-26 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:10:10AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: On 07/26/2012 04:27 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com --- libswscale/swscale.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-26 Thread Måns Rullgård
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes: Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:10:10AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: On 07/26/2012 04:27 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com ---

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-26 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:10:10AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: On 07/26/2012 04:27 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com --- libswscale/swscale.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-26 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:10:10AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: On 07/26/2012 04:27 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com ---

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-26 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:10:10AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: On 07/26/2012 04:27 AM, Ronald

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-26 Thread Måns Rullgård
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes: Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:10:10AM +0200, Luca

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-26 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com wrote: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Diego Biurrun

[libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-25 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com --- libswscale/swscale.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libswscale/swscale.c b/libswscale/swscale.c index 5cfa7f2..0f8ef2b 100644 --- a/libswscale/swscale.c +++ b/libswscale/swscale.c @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ static int

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH] swscale: bury one more piece of inline asm under HAVE_INLINE_ASM.

2012-07-25 Thread Luca Barbato
On 07/26/2012 04:27 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: From: Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com --- libswscale/swscale.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Ok. -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero ___