On 18/04/15 23:52, Timothy Gu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:18 AM Luca Barbato wrote:
>
>> On 14/04/15 22:05, Timothy Gu wrote:
>>> No.
>>>
>>> Consider three tests, the first one succeeds without any output, the
>> second
>>> one outputs some debug information, and the third fails.
>>>
>>>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:18 AM Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 14/04/15 22:05, Timothy Gu wrote:
> > No.
> >
> > Consider three tests, the first one succeeds without any output, the
> second
> > one outputs some debug information, and the third fails.
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > test1:0::
> > test2:0:adsf
On 14/04/15 22:05, Timothy Gu wrote:
> No.
>
> Consider three tests, the first one succeeds without any output, the second
> one outputs some debug information, and the third fails.
>
> Before:
>
> test1:0::
> test2:0:adsfasdfdsafdsafdsFADFadsf==:
> test3:-2:asfasfwer34fsdadf:adsfrqwfdsaadsf
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:43 AM Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Timothy Gu wrote:
> > FATE currently discards this information anyway, so why waste the
> > disk space?
> > --- a/tests/fate-run.sh
> > +++ b/tests/fate-run.sh
> > @@ -211,7 +211,13 @@ else
> >
> > -e
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Timothy Gu wrote:
> FATE currently discards this information anyway, so why waste the
> disk space?
> --- a/tests/fate-run.sh
> +++ b/tests/fate-run.sh
> @@ -211,7 +211,13 @@ else
>
> -echo "${test}:${sig:-$err}:$($base64 <$cmpfile):$($base64 <$errfile)"
