On 01/08/15 4:11 PM, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:49 PM, James Almer wrote:
>> I however think movq/sd should be used here for sse2 and above instead of
>> movlps.
>
> That's a moot point in this case since the code in question is SSE
Ah right, i was thinking about synth_filt
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:49 PM, James Almer wrote:
> I however think movq/sd should be used here for sse2 and above instead of
> movlps.
That's a moot point in this case since the code in question is SSE
only (and even if it wasn't I'm skeptical to the claim that it would
be measurably slower tha
On 01/08/15 3:24 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Henrik Gramner (2015-08-01 17:10:22)
>> ---
>> libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm b/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm
>> index c42ee23..c99df12 100644
>> --- a/l
Quoting Henrik Gramner (2015-08-01 17:10:22)
> ---
> libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm b/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm
> index c42ee23..c99df12 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm
> +++ b/libavcodec/x86/dc
---
libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm b/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm
index c42ee23..c99df12 100644
--- a/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm
+++ b/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ DECODE_HF
addps m4, v
