On 2012-12-16 14:46:54 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
On 2012-12-16 12:36:56 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net
wrote:
Nasm also fails
On 2012-12-14 17:12:05 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
On 2012-12-14 08:32:14 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2012 3:30 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
Arguments on the
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
On 2012-12-14 17:12:05 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
On 2012-12-14 08:32:14 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 14,
On 2012-12-16 12:36:56 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
Nasm also fails on '%1 %+ SUFFIX' with empty SUFFIX in cpuid.asm. It was
previously working since it was always followed by ', %2'. Easiest
solution I've
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
On 2012-12-16 12:36:56 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
Nasm also fails on '%1 %+ SUFFIX' with empty SUFFIX in cpuid.asm. It was
Arguments on the stack are handled properly and functions can use more
than arguments than the 7 registers available on x86_32.
Fixes nasm build, yasm would fail too if it would error out on %error
instead of just emitting a warning.
---
libavutil/x86/x86inc.asm | 1 -
1 file changed, 1
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:30:27PM +0100, Janne Grunau wrote:
Arguments on the stack are handled properly and functions can use more
than arguments than the 7 registers available on x86_32.
more arguments than
The patch is probably OK, but wait for more opinions just in case.
Diego
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2012 3:30 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
Arguments on the stack are handled properly and functions can use more
than arguments than the 7 registers available on x86_32.
Fixes nasm build, yasm would fail too if it would error out on %error
instead of just
On 2012-12-14 08:32:14 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2012 3:30 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
Arguments on the stack are handled properly and functions can use more
than arguments than the 7 registers available on x86_32.
Fixes nasm build, yasm would
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
On 2012-12-14 08:32:14 -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2012 3:30 AM, Janne Grunau janne-li...@jannau.net wrote:
Arguments on the stack are handled properly and functions can use more
than
10 matches
Mail list logo
