On 03/06/15 15:16, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
CC: libav-sta...@libav.org
Bug-Id: CID 1302711
---
libavformat/sctp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/sctp.c b/libavformat/sctp.c
index 71b3a4b..57fd044 100644
--- a/libavformat/sctp.c
+++
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Luca Barbato wrote:
1-6 - Ok
7 - I guess should be an error.
Martin, do you agree?
Nope, there are a few issues with the patches, and 7 is outright wrong.
So with 2/7 and 7/7 dropped, is the set
1-6 - Ok
7 - I guess should be an error.
Martin, do you agree?
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
CC: libav-sta...@libav.org
Bug-Id: CID 1302711
---
libavformat/sctp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/sctp.c b/libavformat/sctp.c
index 71b3a4b..57fd044 100644
--- a/libavformat/sctp.c
+++ b/libavformat/sctp.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Luca Barbato wrote:
1-6 - Ok
7 - I guess should be an error.
Martin, do you agree?
Nope, there are a few issues with the patches, and 7 is outright wrong.
// Martin
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
