On 30/12/11 20:05, Måns Rullgård wrote:
The matter at hand has nothing to do with POSIX compliance. It is
simply incorrect use of *any* normal shell on the user's part. We might
as well add specific instructions to not write --enalbe with --enable is
intended. Someone might do that and not see
Diego Biurrun writes:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:18:14AM -0800, Mike Melanson wrote:
>> On 12/30/2011 11:12 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> >By that reasoning, we should be including the entire wikipedia since
>> >it's full of good information the user might find useful.
>>
>> I'm going to have to
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:35:35 +, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Derek Buitenhuis writes:
>
> > On 30/12/2011 2:17 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >>> > I'm sorry you see it in such a binary fashion.
> >>> >
> >>> > "All or nothing."
> >> So where do you draw the line?
> >
> > I go by this:
> >
> > 1) I
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:18:14AM -0800, Mike Melanson wrote:
> On 12/30/2011 11:12 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >By that reasoning, we should be including the entire wikipedia since
> >it's full of good information the user might find useful.
>
> I'm going to have to protest in order to point out
Derek Buitenhuis writes:
> On 30/12/2011 2:17 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> > I'm sorry you see it in such a binary fashion.
>>> >
>>> > "All or nothing."
>> So where do you draw the line?
>
> I go by this:
>
> 1) Is it documented somewhere accessibly in other projects?
> 2) Do we keep getting q
On 30/12/2011 2:17 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> I'm sorry you see it in such a binary fashion.
>
> "All or nothing."
So where do you draw the line?
I go by this:
1) Is it documented somewhere accessibly in other projects?
2) Do we keep getting questions about it?
3) Is it useful?
1) shows it
On 12/30/2011 11:12 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
By that reasoning, we should be including the entire wikipedia since
it's full of good information the user might find useful.
I'm going to have to protest in order to point out a crucial difference:
I introduced this patch to document an obnoxious
Derek Buitenhuis writes:
> On 30/12/2011 2:12 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> I know it's a "matter of principle", but really, isn't it more
>>> > important for the user to be able to have good access to info
>>> > if they run into this problem?
>> By that reasoning, we should be including the ent
On 30/12/2011 2:12 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
I know it's a "matter of principle", but really, isn't it more
> important for the user to be able to have good access to info
> if they run into this problem?
By that reasoning, we should be including the entire wikipedia since
it's full of good inf
Derek Buitenhuis writes:
> On 30/12/2011 2:06 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> It's not Libav-specific, but if often comes up in Libav. Isn't that
>>> > what a FAQ is for?
>> Then it belongs in a shell FAQ, of which there are plenty, but ours is
>> not one of them.
>
> I know it's a "matter of princ
On 30/12/2011 2:06 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
It's not Libav-specific, but if often comes up in Libav. Isn't that
> what a FAQ is for?
Then it belongs in a shell FAQ, of which there are plenty, but ours is
not one of them.
I know it's a "matter of principle", but really, isn't it more
important
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/12/29 Måns Rullgård :
>> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>>> 2011/11/21 Måns Rullgård :
Luca Barbato writes:
> On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
>> syntax.
>>>
Luca Barbato writes:
> On 29/12/11 18:57, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2011/11/21 Måns Rullgård:
>>> Luca Barbato writes:
>>>
On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
> syntax.
I think it might be
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 29/12/11 18:57, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> 2011/11/21 Måns Rullgård:
>>>
>>> Luca Barbato writes:
>>>
On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
> I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
> s
On 29/12/11 18:57, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
2011/11/21 Måns Rullgård:
Luca Barbato writes:
On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
syntax.
I think it might be a shell specific glitch, dash is quite known for
those...
Hi,
2011/12/29 Måns Rullgård :
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>> 2011/11/21 Måns Rullgård :
>>> Luca Barbato writes:
>>>
On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
> syntax.
I think it might be a shell specif
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/11/21 Måns Rullgård :
>> Luca Barbato writes:
>>
>>> On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
syntax.
>>>
>>> I think it might be a shell specific glitch, dash is quite known fo
Hi,
2011/11/21 Måns Rullgård :
> Luca Barbato writes:
>
>> On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
>>> syntax.
>>
>> I think it might be a shell specific glitch, dash is quite known for
>> those...
>
> We are also not the bug
Luca Barbato writes:
> On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
>> syntax.
>
> I think it might be a shell specific glitch, dash is quite known for
> those...
We are also not the bug tracker for dash.
--
Måns Rullgård
m...@m
On 21/11/11 15:09, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> I don't think this is the right place for a basic tutorial on shell
> syntax.
I think it might be a shell specific glitch, dash is quite known for
those...
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
Diego Biurrun writes:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 09:48:45PM -0800, m...@multimedia.cx wrote:
>> From: Mike Melanson
>>
>> FATE samples paths can not be contain a '~' character. This has bitten me
>> on multiple occasions and I have heard I'm not the only victim.
>>
>> --- a/doc/fate.txt
>> +++
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 09:48:45PM -0800, m...@multimedia.cx wrote:
> From: Mike Melanson
>
> FATE samples paths can not be contain a '~' character. This has bitten me
> on multiple occasions and I have heard I'm not the only victim.
>
> --- a/doc/fate.txt
> +++ b/doc/fate.txt
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @
m...@multimedia.cx writes:
> From: Mike Melanson
>
> FATE samples paths can not be contain a '~' character. This has bitten me
> on multiple occasions and I have heard I'm not the only victim.
Clearly, you do not understand how the shell works. :)
--
Måns Rullgård
m...@mansr.com
__
From: Mike Melanson
FATE samples paths can not be contain a '~' character. This has bitten me
on multiple occasions and I have heard I'm not the only victim.
---
doc/fate.txt |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/fate.txt b/doc/fate.txt
index b23d3f6..ac2b
24 matches
Mail list logo
