On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tom Butterworth wrote:
>> Is this change necessary? There are now two switches that carry out
>> the same purpose and the condition above forces cases from both
>> switches to perform the same operation.
>
> Define "necessary" :)
>
> Setting the tex_rat and tex_fun
Thanks for the detailed review to this patch set Vittorio.
>> This change will reject frames with a texture type which doesn't match the
>> stream description.
>
> Is this change required by the format specification or just as a
> precaution for malformed streams?
Just as a precaution for malfor
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Tom Butterworth wrote:
> This change will reject frames with a texture type which doesn't match the
> stream description.
Is this change required by the format specification or just as a
precaution for malformed streams?
> ---
> libavcodec/hapdec.c | 2
On 17/07/15 14:11, Tom Butterworth wrote:
> This change will reject frames with a texture type which doesn't match the
> stream description.
> ---
> libavcodec/hapdec.c | 27 +--
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
I doubt somebody would generate a strea
This change will reject frames with a texture type which doesn't match the
stream description.
---
libavcodec/hapdec.c | 27 +--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/hapdec.c b/libavcodec/hapdec.c
index ca1c158..324a43a 100644
--- a/lib
