On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 06:00:05PM -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> > This is a fallback for cases where building with yasm enabled, but
> > the compiler doesn't support inline asm (or it is disabled by the
> > user), and the compiler doesn'
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
This is a fallback for cases where building with yasm enabled, but
the compiler doesn't support inline asm (or it is disabled by the
user), and the compiler doesn't support the _mm_empty int
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> This is a fallback for cases where building with yasm enabled, but
> the compiler doesn't support inline asm (or it is disabled by the
> user), and the compiler doesn't support the _mm_empty intrinsic (like
> gcc, if the user hasn't add
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:57:41PM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> This is a fallback for cases where building with yasm enabled, but
> the compiler doesn't support inline asm (or it is disabled by the
> user), and the compiler doesn't support the _mm_empty intrinsic (like
> gcc, if the user hasn't
This is a fallback for cases where building with yasm enabled, but
the compiler doesn't support inline asm (or it is disabled by the
user), and the compiler doesn't support the _mm_empty intrinsic (like
gcc, if the user hasn't added -mmmx to the cflags).
The function is named emms_c - if it were n
