On 2014-02-22 21:34:19 +0100, Guillaume Martres wrote:
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 22:43:13 Luca Barbato wrote:
+if (x 0)
+x_pos = -((-x / 2) s-sps-pixel_shift);
This seems very weird to me, x and y are used to get an index inside the
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 22:43:13 Luca Barbato wrote:
+if (x 0)
+x_pos = -((-x / 2) s-sps-pixel_shift);
This seems very weird to me, x and y are used to get an index inside the
chroma frame so x should never be negative.
On 22/02/14 21:34, Guillaume Martres wrote:
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 22:43:13 Luca Barbato wrote:
+if (x 0)
+x_pos = -((-x / 2) s-sps-pixel_shift);
This seems very weird to me, x and y are used to get an index inside the
chroma frame so x
On 2014-02-21 00:10:05 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 20/02/14 23:58, Janne Grunau wrote:
Also after a cursory glance x can only be smaller than 0 if x0 is smaller
than 0. There are some right shifts of x0 i the same function which are
implementation defined.
IIRC x0 should be at least
On 2014-02-19 22:43:13 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
---
libavcodec/hevc_filter.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c b/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c
index eb3f5f3..8f425d8 100644
--- a/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c
+++
On 20/02/14 23:58, Janne Grunau wrote:
On 2014-02-19 22:43:13 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
---
libavcodec/hevc_filter.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c b/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c
index eb3f5f3..8f425d8 100644
---
---
libavcodec/hevc_filter.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c b/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c
index eb3f5f3..8f425d8 100644
--- a/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c
+++ b/libavcodec/hevc_filter.c
@@ -485,11 +485,17 @@ static void
