On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> ---
>
> I'm quite suspicious of this. It passes tests w/ and w/o a lavc version
> bump,
>
doesn't that mean that the compat layer works as expected?
--
Vittorio
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav
---
I'm quite suspicious of this. It passes tests w/ and w/o a lavc version
bump, but I'm sure it's not completely correct and/or may need further
changes in other parts of the codebase. The documentation bits probably
need changes as well.
avtools/avconv.c | 2 ++
avtools/avplay.c
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:35:19AM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 07:57:42 +0200
> Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > ---
> > libavcodec/decode.c | 11 +++
> > libavcodec/version.h | 3 +++
> > libavfilter/vsrc_movie.c | 5 +
> > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> LGTM,
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 07:57:42 +0200
Diego Biurrun wrote:
> ---
> libavcodec/decode.c | 11 +++
> libavcodec/version.h | 3 +++
> libavfilter/vsrc_movie.c | 5 +
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/decode.c b/libavcodec/decode.c
> index b74c163f9
---
libavcodec/decode.c | 11 +++
libavcodec/version.h | 3 +++
libavfilter/vsrc_movie.c | 5 +
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavcodec/decode.c b/libavcodec/decode.c
index b74c163f92..040e1cc08e 100644
--- a/libavcodec/decode.c
+++ b/libavcodec/decode.c
@
