Re: [libav-devel] [RFC] doxy for internal API

2012-08-01 Thread Justin Ruggles
On 08/01/2012 07:48 AM, an...@khirnov.net wrote: > > Hi, > I have a disagreement with Diego about generating doxygen docs. > > Currently we generate doxygen for all files in Libav, which IMO leads to > horribly cluttered output. > See e.g. > https://libav.org/doxygen/master/files.html > https://l

Re: [libav-devel] [RFC] doxy for internal API

2012-08-01 Thread Mashiat Sarker Shakkhar
On 8/1/2012 5:48 PM, an...@khirnov.net wrote: [...] If there indeed are people who read generated doxy for non-public API, s/ for non-public API// ;P I'd like them to speak up and prove their existence. Speaking as a user, I just open the header file and read the relevant part. (Also from

[libav-devel] [RFC] doxy for internal API

2012-08-01 Thread anton
Hi, I have a disagreement with Diego about generating doxygen docs. Currently we generate doxygen for all files in Libav, which IMO leads to horribly cluttered output. See e.g. https://libav.org/doxygen/master/files.html https://libav.org/doxygen/master/annotated.html https://libav.org/doxygen/ma