Hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> Hendrik Leppkes writes:
>>>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
> Does msvc support additional
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Hendrik Leppkes writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>>
Does msvc support additional alignment for local variables?
>>>
>>> Using __declspec(align(...)) sho
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Hendrik Leppkes writes:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Does msvc support additional alignment for local variables?
>>
>> Using __declspec(align(...)) should do just that with MSVC. Seems it is
>>
Hendrik Leppkes writes:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>>
>> Does msvc support additional alignment for local variables?
>
> Using __declspec(align(...)) should do just that with MSVC. Seems it is
> already implemented like this using DECLARE_ALIGNED as well.
Good, t
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
> Does msvc support additional alignment for local variables?
>
Using __declspec(align(...)) should do just that with MSVC. Seems it is
already implemented like this using DECLARE_ALIGNED as well.
- Hendrik
___
Benjamin Larsson writes:
> On 09/11/2012 10:32 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice if we could get at least shared lib linking with MSVC
>>> before
>>> 0.9 is released. Releasing half-working MSVC support seems... meh.
>> Nobody appears to have started working on this,
>
> Not true.
On 09/11/2012 10:32 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
It would be nice if we could get at least shared lib linking with MSVC before
0.9 is released. Releasing half-working MSVC support seems... meh.
Nobody appears to have started working on this,
Not true. I'm all for waiting until shared libs are wo
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
>> On 06/09/2012 6:34 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>> So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
>>> and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is abou
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:34:14AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
> and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is about
> to release 1.0, they would benefit from a libav release.
>
> Maybe we can at leas
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:33:48AM -0400, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 6:34 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
> > and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is about
> > to release 1.0, they would
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 6:34 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
>> and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is about
>> to release 1.0, they would benefit
On 06/09/2012 6:34 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
> and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is about
> to release 1.0, they would benefit from a libav release.
>
> Maybe we can at least roll a 0.9-alpha
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:34:14 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
>> and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is about
>> to release 1.0, they would
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:13:00AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:34:14 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
> > and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is about
> > to release 1.0,
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:34:14 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
> and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is about
> to release 1.0, they would benefit from a libav release.
>
> Maybe we can at least ro
So, could we make a new release soon? I know there are a few issues here
and there, but nothing serious should be blocking it. gstreamer is about
to release 1.0, they would benefit from a libav release.
Maybe we can at least roll a 0.9-alpha tarball and promise not to make
any more API changes u
16 matches
Mail list logo
