Re: [libav-devel] Skipping checkasm on MSVC DLL setups?

2016-12-31 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016, Diego Biurrun wrote: Hmmm... On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:51:36AM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: It seems like checkasm has started failing to build in MSVC DLL setups recently, see e.g. this instance: https://fate.libav.org/i686-msvc-10-dll-wine The reason is that

Re: [libav-devel] Skipping checkasm on MSVC DLL setups?

2016-12-30 Thread Diego Biurrun
Hmmm... On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:51:36AM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: > It seems like checkasm has started failing to build in MSVC DLL setups > recently, see e.g. this instance: > https://fate.libav.org/i686-msvc-10-dll-wine > > The reason is that once you build with --enable-shared

Re: [libav-devel] Skipping checkasm on MSVC DLL setups?

2016-12-19 Thread Luca Barbato
On 19/12/2016 10:51, Martin Storsjö wrote: > Since checkasm in MSVC DLL builds isn't that important, since it's > covered pretty well in other test setups anyway, I would suggest to just > disable checkasm in this case. We easily have got CONFIG_SHARED > available in makefile, but I guess we'd

[libav-devel] Skipping checkasm on MSVC DLL setups?

2016-12-19 Thread Martin Storsjö
Hi, It seems like checkasm has started failing to build in MSVC DLL setups recently, see e.g. this instance: https://fate.libav.org/i686-msvc-10-dll-wine The reason is that once you build with --enable-shared with MSVC, you can't link those object files via static libraries any longer. (See