Quoting Luca Barbato (2015-05-14 19:30:56)
Two patches, 1 is for general safety, while the second is possibly
stable-worthy.
If the problem this is supposed to solve is a caller sending a packet
with uninitialized fields, then I'd say the problem is on the caller
side. One should never send
On 18/05/15 22:06, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Luca Barbato (2015-05-14 19:30:56)
Two patches, 1 is for general safety, while the second is possibly
stable-worthy.
If the problem this is supposed to solve is a caller sending a packet
with uninitialized fields, then I'd say the problem is on
Two patches, 1 is for general safety, while the second is possibly
stable-worthy.
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
