On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:53:58PM +0100, sto@web.de wrote:
Am 19.11.2012 22:26, schrieb Diego Biurrun:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0100, sto@web.de wrote:
'k', 'M', and 'G' are SI (unit) prefixes or metric prefixes,
not 'number postfixes'. Also, the statement regarding binary
On 11/19/12 10:53 PM, sto@web.de wrote:
Am 19.11.2012 22:26, schrieb Diego Biurrun:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0100, sto@web.de wrote:
'k', 'M', and 'G' are SI (unit) prefixes or metric prefixes,
not 'number postfixes'. Also, the statement regarding binary
prefixes (powers of
'k', 'M', and 'G' are SI (unit) prefixes or metric prefixes,
not 'number postfixes'. Also, the statement regarding binary
prefixes (powers of 2 are used instead of powers of 10)
might be misinterpreted (1 kB = 10^3 B, but 1 KiB != 2^3 B).
--
https://github.com/stomar/
diff --git
On 11/19/12 9:39 PM, sto@web.de wrote:
'k', 'M', and 'G' are SI (unit) prefixes or metric prefixes,
not 'number postfixes'. Also, the statement regarding binary
prefixes (powers of 2 are used instead of powers of 10)
might be misinterpreted (1 kB = 10^3 B, but 1 KiB != 2^3 B).
Sounds ok
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0100, sto@web.de wrote:
'k', 'M', and 'G' are SI (unit) prefixes or metric prefixes,
not 'number postfixes'. Also, the statement regarding binary
prefixes (powers of 2 are used instead of powers of 10)
might be misinterpreted (1 kB = 10^3 B, but 1 KiB !=
Am 19.11.2012 22:26, schrieb Diego Biurrun:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0100, sto@web.de wrote:
'k', 'M', and 'G' are SI (unit) prefixes or metric prefixes,
not 'number postfixes'. Also, the statement regarding binary
prefixes (powers of 2 are used instead of powers of 10)
might be
