On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:44:03PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:01:57 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >> > And I hear there's some trouble with the
On 10/07/2012 02:01 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> It often leads to smaller code. Instead of AVPixFmtDesc *d =
> getter(pix_fmt); if (!d) return -1; printf("%d\n", d->something);, you
> can just do printf("%d\n", array[pix_fmt].something);. Do we really
> need to babysit our users?
It can be _quit
On 07/10/2012 1:16 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> As I said this patch makes the ABI more stable, and distributions love
> ABI stability, so please do not discount it simply because your use
> cases don't care about it. We already have a V8 with its own ABI problems.
I have to agree with Diego an
On 06/10/2012 22:11, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> >
>> > The same way we can never have msvc support?
> Right.
>
> Shall we move on to more practical patches?
Sure, are we going to stop reviewing MSVC fixes?
As I said this patch makes the ABI more stable, and distributions love
ABI stability, so
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:44:03 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:01:57 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On S
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:44:03 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:01:57 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:01:57 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 12:35:44 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:01:57 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 12:35:44 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >> > ---
> >> > avprobe.c |
On 06/10/2012 17:01, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> > It prevents the caller from accessing all the descriptors when he's
>> > using a newer library than the one he compiled against.
> if (compile_ver > runtime_ver) error(); on app init. Likely, you want
> to do that anyway.
>
Actually Anton is refer
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 12:35:44 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> > ---
>> > avprobe.c |6 +++---
>> > cmdutils.c| 16 +++-
>> > tools/graph2dot
On 10/06/2012 09:35 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>> @@ -629,9 +630,8 @@ static void show_stream(AVFormatContext *fmt_ctx, int
>> stream_idx)
>>rational_string(val_str, sizeof(val_str), ":",
>>&display_aspect_ratio));
>> }
>>
On 10/06/2012 06:58 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> ---
> avprobe.c |6 +++---
> cmdutils.c| 16 +++-
> tools/graph2dot.c |4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Seems fine.
lu
___
libav-devel
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 12:35:44 -0700, "Ronald S. Bultje"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > ---
> > avprobe.c |6 +++---
> > cmdutils.c| 16 +++-
> > tools/graph2dot.c |4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> ---
> avprobe.c |6 +++---
> cmdutils.c| 16 +++-
> tools/graph2dot.c |4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/avprobe.c b/avprobe.c
> index 16a5d29..3a3ae0f 100
14 matches
Mail list logo
