L'octidi 18 pluviôse, an CCXX, John Dexter a écrit :
> If you're going to make such assertions please back them up. My
> research into dynamic linking of (L)GPL libraries finds multiple
> explicit claims that distribution of the library source code is _not_
> required if I haven't modified the orig
Hi
I have some audio with G.711 and g.729 codecs.
I am able to decode the g729 but not g711.
So, I ant to know do FFMPEg supports g711 at all? It has two flavours i
guess:- u-law and a-law.
So, if somebody has any idea how to decode g711 codec with ffmpeg do let me
know.
__
NITIN GOYAL writes:
> I am able to decode the g729 but not g711.
Command line and complete, uncut console output missing.
And consider providing a sample.
Carl Eugen
___
Libav-user mailing list
Libav-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo
Please help us help you - provide
- version of libs you use
- compilable minimized source code of your app
- this sample file
BTW, did you try to transcode it with ffmpeg command-line utility? If
it also fails, please provide its full output with -loglevel debug
BTW2 try to av_log_set_level(AV_LOG
On 6 February 2012 09:32, Nicolas George wrote:
> L'octidi 18 pluviôse, an CCXX, John Dexter a écrit :
>> If you're going to make such assertions please back them up. My
>> research into dynamic linking of (L)GPL libraries finds multiple
>> explicit claims that distribution of the library source c
John Dexter writes:
> obviously I have no problem providing source if asked to,
You misunderstand:
If you don't want to "accompany" your binary distribution with the
corresponding source code, you have to add a legally binding written
offer that you will provide the source code on request.
Th
Carl Eugen Hoyos writes:
> > I read somewhere that including a link to where users could download
> > the source themselves can be counted as "distributing the source"?
>
> ... do exactly this as explained on http://ffmpeg.org/legal.html
> (because we think you can argue that the corresponding s
On 6 February 2012 17:14, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> John Dexter writes:
>
> > obviously I have no problem providing source if asked to,
>
> You misunderstand:
> If you don't want to "accompany" your binary distribution with the
> corresponding source code, you have to add a legally binding writt
L'octidi 18 pluviôse, an CCXX, John Dexter a écrit :
> If you're going to make such assertions please back them up. My
> research into dynamic linking of (L)GPL libraries finds multiple
> explicit claims that distribution of the library source code is _not_
> required if I haven't modified the or
On Feb 6, 2012 11:36 AM, "NITIN GOYAL" wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have some audio with G.711 and g.729 codecs.
>
> I am able to decode the g729 but not g711.
>
> So, I ant to know do FFMPEg supports g711 at all? It has two flavours i
guess:- u-law and a-law.
Yes, theoretically both flavors are supporte
Hi All,
I compiled the ffmpeg source to generate the static(.a foramt)
libraries in linux.
When i am linking the static libraries with my application,
i am getting undefined reference for many functions.
Even i tried with pkg-config.
Here command , what i tried
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libr
Hi Andrey,
Thanks for the help!
1. Lib versions: Using the shared library and my code below, I tried 0.8.3
(PC) and 08d2cee4 (Mac) and could not scan the file. However, I tried the
static executable of 0.8 and 0.10 on Mac and I *could* transcode it to MP4.
2. Link to video (it's almost 2gb):
htt
I updated all the deprecated functions and I'm still having the same
problem.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Simon Daniels wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> 1. Lib versions: Using the shared library and my code below, I tried 0.8.3
> (PC) and 08d2cee4 (Mac) and could not scan the
13 matches
Mail list logo
