Re: [Libav-user] Using ffmpeg.exe in a project (non-commercial)

2012-02-23 Thread John Dexter
On 23 February 2012 01:19, Phil Turmel phi...@turmel.org wrote: On 02/22/2012 10:53 AM, Benjamin Gamisch wrote: [...] I would appreciate an answer whether I am allowed to use the FFMPEG.exe file or not. Per your screenshot, probably not.  If you distribute FFmpeg, you must follow the

Re: [Libav-user] Using ffmpeg.exe in a project (non-commercial)

2012-02-23 Thread jan hölscher
2012/2/23 John Dexter jdxsoluti...@gmail.com On 23 February 2012 01:19, Phil Turmel phi...@turmel.org wrote: On 02/22/2012 10:53 AM, Benjamin Gamisch wrote: [...] I would appreciate an answer whether I am allowed to use the FFMPEG.exe file or not. Per your screenshot, probably not.

Re: [Libav-user] Using ffmpeg.exe in a project (non-commercial)

2012-02-23 Thread John Dexter
On 23 February 2012 09:41, jan hölscher jan.hoelsc...@codergrid.de wrote: 2012/2/23 John Dexter jdxsoluti...@gmail.com On 23 February 2012 01:19, Phil Turmel phi...@turmel.org wrote: On 02/22/2012 10:53 AM, Benjamin Gamisch wrote: [...] I would appreciate an answer whether I am allowed

Re: [Libav-user] Using ffmpeg.exe in a project (non-commercial)

2012-02-23 Thread Phil Turmel
On 02/23/2012 04:05 AM, John Dexter wrote: On 23 February 2012 01:19, Phil Turmel phi...@turmel.org wrote: On 02/22/2012 10:53 AM, Benjamin Gamisch wrote: [...] I would appreciate an answer whether I am allowed to use the FFMPEG.exe file or not. Per your screenshot, probably not. If you

Re: [Libav-user] Using ffmpeg.exe in a project (non-commercial)

2012-02-23 Thread John Dexter
On 23 February 2012 12:07, Phil Turmel phi...@turmel.org wrote: Finally, whatever the legality, it is at least rude to hijack an open- source app's website bandwidth to deliver source code to *your* users. Apart from the inherent problem of defining social etiquette within a legal contract...

Re: [Libav-user] Using ffmpeg.exe in a project (non-commercial)

2012-02-23 Thread Phil Turmel
On 02/23/2012 07:16 AM, John Dexter wrote: On 23 February 2012 12:07, Phil Turmel phi...@turmel.org wrote: Finally, whatever the legality, it is at least rude to hijack an open- source app's website bandwidth to deliver source code to *your* users. Apart from the inherent problem of defining

Re: [Libav-user] Using ffmpeg.exe in a project (non-commercial)

2012-02-23 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
John Dexter jdxsolutions@... writes: On 23 February 2012 12:07, Phil Turmel philip@... wrote: Finally, whatever the legality, it is at least rude to hijack an open- source app's website bandwidth to deliver source code to *your* users. Apart from the inherent problem of defining social

Re: [Libav-user] Using ffmpeg.exe in a project (non-commercial)

2012-02-22 Thread Phil Turmel
On 02/22/2012 10:53 AM, Benjamin Gamisch wrote: [...] I would appreciate an answer whether I am allowed to use the FFMPEG.exe file or not. Per your screenshot, probably not. If you distribute FFmpeg, you must follow the license. There's no exception for non-commercial use. You must provide