On 12/24/2012 05:10 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> I think that the reason is simple and obvious: society shifts to
> preferring more impersonal communication. Same reason that teenagers
> prefer texting to talking on phone, and hanging out to dating.
>From what I can tell, it is the exact opposite.
On 12/26/2012 12:34 PM, Eric S Johnson wrote:
> Nathan, you've doubtless seen this article. What do your Tibetan friends say
> about this?
It is a great article, and such a short, fascinating study into the
mindset of an activist under clear, demonstrable state surveillance. I
think the point abou
> in India with the Tibetan community there, I have seen Skype, on mobiles
> at least, almost thoroughly replaced by WeChat, a WhatsApp/Kakao clone
> made by TenCent, the same Chinese company who created QQ. To my personal
> horror, we have gone from a somewhat secure Skype with a questionable
> ba
Getting someone who gets their security advice from Forbes to evaluate and
select tools for secure private communications is probably non-trivial,
but worthwhile.
This is, hopefully, the start of a practical general checklist.
Comments and suggestions would be appreciated. Happy holidays!
It may
pacificboy writes:
> Does anyone know of any Mac OS/X software programs that would stop RST and
> DoS that are injected in the internet in places like China and its GFW?
You could make a firewall ignore some RSTs, but assuming the ISP injects
resets in both directions, the RST that the ISP sends
Does anyone know of any Mac OS/X software programs that would stop RST and DoS
that are injected in the internet in places like China and its GFW?
Sent from my iPhone
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
