Re: [liberationtech] The Privacy Book, by James Black, PhD?

2013-02-16 Thread Lisa Brownlee
Never heard of it or him. Jules? Marc? On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Steve Weis wrote: > I see nothing online to indicate that this book is good and don't want to > spend "0.5 grams of gold" to find out. > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Lee Fisher wrote: > >> Does anyone have any opini

Re: [liberationtech] [Freedombox-discuss] FBX Server/Client Communication Model and Threat Modeling

2013-02-16 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 16 February 2013 04:25, Nick M. Daly wrote: > Hi folks, here's an active question that I'd appreciate your input on. > > What is an appropriate threat-model for the FreedomBox's > client-server communications? > > Please discuss on list or feel free to add to the FBX wiki: > > http

[liberationtech] Financial Times - Death in Singapore- US electronics engineer Shane Todd ....

2013-02-16 Thread jam
I just thought the others on this list might find the article worthy of a read [link below]. Its about the suspicious death of Shane Todd, and illicit knowledge transfers.http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/afbddb44-7640-11e2-8eb6-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2L4fxyk3B -- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change pa

Re: [liberationtech] [Freedombox-discuss] FBX Server/Client Communication Model and Threat Modeling

2013-02-16 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/15/2013 10:25 PM, Nick M. Daly wrote: >For example, is it acceptable if the client's secret key be exposed >when the box is rooted by attackers? (Probably not, but that does >let the host act as a trust proxy without relying on subkeys, or >other weird yet conceptually intere

[liberationtech] Announcing CryptoParty SF II: Enciphered Boogaloo

2013-02-16 Thread Parker Higgins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Libtech, We all enjoyed the first SF CryptoParty so much that we decided to do it again. CryptoParty II: Enciphered Boogaloo is going to happen on Saturday March 23 from 2-6pm at Langton Labs (9 Langton Street). Sign up at https://cryptopartysf.

Re: [liberationtech] [Freedombox-discuss] FBX Server/Client Communication Model and Threat Modeling

2013-02-16 Thread Nick M. Daly
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > On 02/15/2013 10:25 PM, Nick M. Daly wrote: >>For example, is it acceptable if the client's secret key be exposed >>when the box is rooted by attackers? (Probably not, but that does >>let the host act as a trust proxy without relying on subkeys, or >>

[liberationtech] Using Intellectual Property to Advance Human Rights on 2/21

2013-02-16 Thread Yosem Companys
From: Lisa Li *Using Intellectual Property to Advance Human Rights* *Madhavi Sunder, UC Davis School of Law* Madhavi Sunder calls for a richer understanding of intellectual property law’s effects on social and cultural life. Intellectual property law does more than incentivize the production

Re: [liberationtech] [Freedombox-discuss] FBX Server/Client Communication Model and Threat Modeling

2013-02-16 Thread Nick M. Daly
As before, please continue this discussion here or on the FBX wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ClientServerCommunication Melvin Carvalho writes: > Hi Nick, great topic. Which client/server interactions would you envisage > as being high on the priority list? e.g. ssh to box, login