(reply-to-list-only)
On Apr 23, 2013, at 16:39, Michael Allan wrote:
> Maybe there's a misunderstanding here. The list subscribers are not
> responsible for the safe administration of the list. The university
> alone is responsible. It could never pass that responsibility on to
> the subscrib
Joseph Lorenzo Hall said:
> ... if you don't accept the decision of the list members ...
Maybe there's a misunderstanding here. The list subscribers are not
responsible for the safe administration of the list. The university
alone is responsible. It could never pass that responsibility on to
th
I would suggest if you don't accept the decision of the list members to
keep reply-to-list, you should not subscribe. It seems silly to raise it
again and attempt to appeal to higher authorities that have much better
things on which to spend their time than mediate disputes about mailing
list polic
I thought this may be of interest to some people on this list:
-- Forwarded message --
From: OUseful.Info, the blog...
**
Tony Hirst posted: "I was due to be at #odw13 today, but circumstances
beyond my control intruded... The presentation I was down to give related
to some of
We are an organization working to bring transparency to and fight online
censorship in China. We operate GreatFire.org which enables real-time
testing of what is blocked by the Great Firewall and the most complete and
updated database of URLs and keywords blocked in China. We also operate
FreeWeibo
