Re: [liberationtech] Satori - distributed tamper-resistant circumvention tools

2014-05-04 Thread Griffin Boyce
On 2014-05-04 01:02, Nick wrote: https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/crx is the documentation that mentions the signing. There are a couple of scripts there that will create a signed .crx file. I also wrote one a while ago[0]. I don't know how crx files integrate with Google's developer acco

Re: [liberationtech] One third IT managers think can Cloud compute with encrypted data

2014-05-04 Thread Caspar Bowden (lists)
Nope, not attachment either, should have used *link * in the first place CB -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanfo

Re: [liberationtech] One third IT managers think can Cloud compute with encrypted data

2014-05-04 Thread Caspar Bowden (lists)
On 04/05/14 17:19, Caspar Bowden (lists) wrote: I downloaded Ponemon/Thales new survey of n=4275 IT managers (United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Australia, Japan, Brazil, and Russia) a couple of days ago by registering here , but they appear to have no

[liberationtech] One third IT managers think can Cloud compute with encrypted data

2014-05-04 Thread Caspar Bowden (lists)
I downloaded Ponemon/Thales new survey of n=4275 IT managers (United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Australia, Japan, Brazil, and Russia) a couple of days ago by registering here , but they appear to have now pulled the report. It is remarkable that one

Re: [liberationtech] Satori - distributed tamper-resistant circumvention tools

2014-05-04 Thread Nick
Quoth Andrew Cady: > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 12:35:39PM -0400, Nick wrote: > > if you're worried about an evil google, hey, they control the > > browser, so you've already lost. > > I use Chromium and update it through my distro, so no, Google > does not control the browser (/usr/bin/chromium). M

Re: [liberationtech] Satori - distributed tamper-resistant circumvention tools

2014-05-04 Thread Andrew Cady
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 12:35:39PM -0400, Nick wrote: > if you're worried about an evil google, hey, they control the > browser, so you've already lost. I use Chromium and update it through my distro, so no, Google does not control the browser (/usr/bin/chromium). But they do, still, control the

Re: [liberationtech] Satori - distributed tamper-resistant circumvention tools

2014-05-04 Thread Andrew Cady
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Nathan Freitas wrote: > > On May 2, 2014 8:46:08 PM EDT, Griffin Boyce > wrote: > > > On 2014-05-02 20:35, Andrew Cady wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:22:11PM -0400, Griffin Boyce wrote: > > > > > > > I can't be vanned/rubber-hosed because I do

Re: [liberationtech] Satori - distributed tamper-resistant circumvention tools

2014-05-04 Thread Griffin Boyce
Nathan Freitas wrote: Automated distributed deterministic build comparisons FTW! Seriously, it seems like we are pretty close with such a thing for Android APKs, so perhaps Chrome extension bundles could be added to the list, as well. That sounds pretty awesome :D Apps and extensions are .c