Whoah, what happened here? Some bot seems to have mangled a bunch of Duke
language into the announcement that Betsy posted. Anybody who is interested
should look at her post. Or am I missing something?
On Jun 4, 2014 7:00 PM, Yosem Companys compa...@stanford.edu wrote:
The Bureau of Democracy,
Elvira edu...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/03/14 13:41, Steve Schultze wrote:
Greetings all,
A couple of years ago, I did some limited research on signed (but
not encrypted) HTTP responses. I discovered that although it had
been considered briefly
Greetings all,
A couple of years ago, I did some limited research on signed (but not
encrypted) HTTP responses. I discovered that although it had been
considered briefly by a few folks in the past, it never went anywhere. This
continues to be surprising to me, given the ever increasing need to
For context, $50.5m was the FY14 omnibus appropriations bill amount.
The President's budget is only one of many inputs into the actual
appropriations that result. Not sure what the brackets signal.
At State, much of our IF funding comes from funds that are not necessarily
explicitly called out
like poly1305.
Good luck getting it implemented anywhere. It would need a fair bit of
special treatment, like browsers explicitly recognizing it as *not* an
encrypted connection despite being an SSL cipher suite.
- Sent from my phone
Den 11 mar 2014 13:41 skrev Steve Schultze sjschul
