[liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Eugen Leitl
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/12/05/0115214/itu-approves-deep-packet-inspection ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection Posted by Soulskill on Tuesday December 04, @08:19PM from the inspect-my-encryption-all-you'd-like dept. dsinc sends this quote from Techdirt about the International Telecommu

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread ilf
Eugen Leitl: ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection I have been trying to get more information on this for days. Slashdot only links to CDT and Techdirt, with Techdirt only relying on CDT. So the base source for all three is this: https://www.cdt.org/blogs/cdt/2811adoption-traffic-sniffing-stan

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Julian Oliver
..on Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:27:53AM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/12/05/0115214/itu-approves-deep-packet-inspection > > ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection I guess the 'optional' part of IPSec in IPv6 just became a little more political. Cheers, -- Julian Oli

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Andre Rebentisch
Am 05.12.2012 10:27, schrieb Eugen Leitl: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/12/05/0115214/itu-approves-deep-packet-inspection ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection Posted by Soulskill on Tuesday December 04, @08:19PM from the inspect-my-encryption-all-you'd-like dept. dsinc sends this quote from

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Nicholas Judd
t/dms_pages/itu-t/rec/T-REC-RSS.xml > > > > -Original Message- > From: liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu > [mailto:liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Asher Wolf > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 7:38 AM > To: liberationtech@lists.s

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Christian Fuchs
-t/rec/T-REC-RSS.xml -Original Message- From: liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu [mailto:liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Asher Wolf Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 7:38 AM To: liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Pack

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Petter Ericson
aspx > > > > http://www.itu.int/dms_pages/itu-t/rec/T-REC-RSS.xml > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu > > [mailto:liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Asher Wolf > > Sent:

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Fenwick Mckelvey
gt; >> > http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/publications/Pages/latest.aspx >> > >> > http://www.itu.int/dms_pages/itu-t/rec/T-REC-RSS.xml >> > >> > >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu &

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Eugen Leitl
- Forwarded message from Tom Taylor - From: Tom Taylor Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:01:41 -0500 To: na...@nanog.org Subject: Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 I'm seriously not clear

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Wayne Moore
What legitimate uses do you see? On 12/5/2012 10:34, Petter Ericson wrote: > There are legitimate uses for DPI, -- Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. William Pitt (1759-1806) -- Unsubscribe, change to dig

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Petter Ericson
TU is ideologically removed from the way the > >> Internet is now governed. > >> > >> Am I on target here? > >> > >> On Dec 5, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Cynthia Wong wrote: > >> > >> > The final version of the standard should show up here... eventu

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Petter Ericson
Transparent IPv4-to-IPv6 tunneling, detection of certain forms of abuse, QoS modificaton, traffic monitoring and shaping. Obviouly, these are mostly happening at a firewall or equivalent, which is kind of the point. Very little DPI is legitimate in core networking. /P On 05 December, 2012 - W

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Wayne Moore
Well perhaps I'm over my head here, not really my field but it seems that with the exception of some forms of abuse all these can be done by inspecting the packet headers. My understanding of DPI, as Deep Packet Inspection was looking at the content not just the routing and protocol information. O

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Julian Oliver
..on Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:37:16AM -0800, Wayne Moore wrote: > Well perhaps I'm over my head here, not really my field but it seems > that with the exception of some forms of abuse all these can be done by > inspecting the packet headers. My understanding of DPI, as Deep Packet > Inspection was l

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Fenwick Mckelvey
Hi all, I'd be interested in knowing if this document specifies any retention capabilities / requirements. My concern is with DPI appliances like the Bivio NetFalcon which promise much great and actionable traffic logging for lawful access, see: http://www.cert.org/flocon/2011/presentations/Ebrahim

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Pavol Luptak
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Christian Fuchs wrote: > If this approval by the ITU is true - then it is no surprise at all, > but what one would expect. What else has the ITU in the past ever > been than an instrument that supports capitalist interests and > commodification of the ICT a

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Petter Ericson
On 05 December, 2012 - Pavol Luptak wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Christian Fuchs wrote: > > If this approval by the ITU is true - then it is no surprise at all, > > but what one would expect. What else has the ITU in the past ever > > been than an instrument that supports cap

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Asher Wolf
Latest copy of the ITU's DPI recommendations: http://brendan.so/2012/12/06/leak-draft-new-recommendation-itu-t-y-2770-formerly-y-dpireq/ - Asher Wolf On 6/12/12 9:41 AM, Petter Ericson wrote: > On 05 December, 2012 - Pavol Luptak wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Christi

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread KheOps
Hi, Le 05/12/2012 23:10, Pavol Luptak a écrit : > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Christian Fuchs wrote: [...] > > DPI censorship is not a 'competitive' advantage, so it's quite likely that > in a pure market society ('anarchocapitalism') without strong socialistic > governments and t

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Julian Oliver
..on Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:19:47PM +0100, KheOps wrote: > Hi, > > Le 05/12/2012 23:10, Pavol Luptak a écrit : > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Christian Fuchs wrote: > > [...] > > > > > DPI censorship is not a 'competitive' advantage, so it's quite likely that > > in a pure marke

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Asher Wolf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/12/12 11:19 PM, KheOps wrote: > I'd say it can happen for purely economic reasons. For instance, > in France, some ISPs used to have marketing agreements with > Dailymotion and consequently slowed down Youtube access. > > Another exemple is th

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Erich M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/06/2012 01:40 PM, Asher Wolf wrote: > > * DPI-based policing of peer-to-peer traffic * Services-based > billing That is all in, Asher, but everything starts on these 90 or so pages with identifying crypto protocols and the matching of "signa

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Samuel Carlisle
Good work Asher *high five* http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/06/dpi_standard_leaked/ On 6 December 2012 12:40, Asher Wolf wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 6/12/12 11:19 PM, KheOps wrote: > > > I'd say it can happen for purely economic reasons. For instance,

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Asher Wolf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 woah, just read the translation. thank you. On 7/12/12 2:21 AM, Erich M. wrote: > On 12/06/2012 01:40 PM, Asher Wolf wrote: > >> * DPI-based policing of peer-to-peer traffic * Services-based >> billing > > > > That is all in, Asher, but everythin

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Philipp Winter
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:28:36PM +0100, Petter Ericson wrote: > Transparent IPv4-to-IPv6 tunneling, detection of certain > forms of abuse, QoS modificaton, traffic monitoring and > shaping. > > Obviouly, these are mostly happening at a firewall or > equivalent, which is kind of the point. Very

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Erich M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/06/2012 04:31 PM, Asher Wolf wrote: > woah, just read the translation. thank you. Compliment in return! Great to discuss this here. Apparently the doq has surfaced in Australia and Austria around the same time via different channels. Good Omen ;

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 01:11:08PM -0500, Nicholas Judd wrote: > If I could tap into your hive-mind intelligence for a moment to help me > be more precise about explaining why this is an issue, I would appreciate it > ... Others have articulated a number of reasons for this already, so I'll attem

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-11 Thread Pavol Luptak
Hi, On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:19:47PM +0100, KheOps wrote: > > DPI censorship is not a 'competitive' advantage, so it's quite likely that > > in a pure market society ('anarchocapitalism') without strong socialistic > > governments and their stupid Internet regulations, most Internet providers

Re: [liberationtech] /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-11 Thread Pavol Luptak
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:25:46PM +0100, Julian Oliver wrote: > Great examples. > > I've often experienced what appears to be severe throttling of an Alice DSL > connection (Germany) after using bittorrent, whether that be to download a > Linux > ISO or otherwise. It persists for an hour or so