Who else is going to bell the damn cat, my dear?
The New Yorker, with their tips drop box subject to NSA National Security
Letters? The many other scrappy little projects that seem not to have been
able to have put together high profile and trust in the global
consciousness?
I suppose there are
On 11/12/2015 11:37 AM, Douglas Lucas wrote:
> Curious for the community's thoughts on these two questions.
>
> 1. It's not my theory, but what do you make of the theory that
> WikiLeaks would go under if it were not of the steady stream of
> celebrity endorsements (Lady Gaga, Pamela Anderson, man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> theory that WikiLeaks would go under if it were not of the steady
> stream of celebrity endorsements
Oh man. The reasons for Wikileaks continued relevance go way deeper
than endorsements.
While I think the show of solidarity is welcomed, when it co
Dear Libtech,
Curious for the community's thoughts on these two questions.
1. It's not my theory, but what do you make of the theory that WikiLeaks
would go under if it were not of the steady stream of celebrity
endorsements (Lady Gaga, Pamela Anderson, many more)? Is hugely
emphasized "soft powe
