On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:02:15PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
YaCY and other FOSS engines (in a sibling thread someone mentioned
another that I already forgot) are also something that I will accept
search plugins for the Omnibox, but their result quality, index depth,
and crawl frequency are no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2013 09:16 PM, Daniel Sieradski wrote:
Has there ever been any effort to create an open source search
engine that is entirely transparent in both its software and
practices? (dmoz.org
doesn't count!)
...YaCY?
http://yacy.de/
- --
The
The Doctor:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2013 09:16 PM, Daniel Sieradski wrote:
Has there ever been any effort to create an open source search
engine that is entirely transparent in both its software and
practices? (dmoz.org
doesn't count!)
...YaCY?
On 27/06/13 01:02, Mike Perry wrote:
The Doctor:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2013 09:16 PM, Daniel Sieradski wrote:
Has there ever been any effort to create an open source search
engine that is entirely transparent in both its software and
practices? (dmoz.org
Nadim Kobeissi:
I'd just like to add that I'm a DuckDuckGo user myself and that I can
definitely vouch for the service.
I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for DuckDuckGo. What
does this even mean? Nobody seems to be capable of rationally explaining
it.
Have you inspected their
Has there ever been any effort to create an open source search engine that is
entirely transparent in both its software and practices? (dmoz.org doesn't
count!)
--
Daniel Sieradski
d...@danielsieradski.com
http://danielsieradski.com
315.889.1444
Follow me at http://twitter.com/selfagency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2013 08:20 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for DuckDuckGo.
What does this even mean? Nobody seems to be capable of rationally
explaining it.
Have you inspected their datacenter/server security?
Michael Carbone:
On 06/24/2013 08:20 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for DuckDuckGo.
What does this even mean? Nobody seems to be capable of rationally
explaining it.
Have you inspected their datacenter/server security? Have you
audited their
On 2013-06-24, at 8:20 PM, Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org wrote:
Nadim Kobeissi:
I'd just like to add that I'm a DuckDuckGo user myself and that I can
definitely vouch for the service.
I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for DuckDuckGo. What
does this even mean?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2013 10:00 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
Michael Carbone:
On 06/24/2013 08:20 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for
DuckDuckGo. What does this even mean? Nobody seems to be
capable of rationally explaining
10 matches
Mail list logo
