Hi,
My activist group has organized a number of strategic sign-on letters over
the years--and used them successfully to change various policies. Rarely,
however, does such a letter alone do the trick--but it's good as part of a
multi-pronged strategy.
The key question is: What does Microsoft lead
Dear Kate,
Am 17.01.2013 08:48, schrieb Kate Krauss:
You may find that their public image is really important to them--they
seem to be trying to be a little more cool. Microsoft gets a lot out
of Skype's friendly brand and a lot of human rights credibility
through its association with the G
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Andre Rebentisch wrote:
> Definitely not. It is an organisation that does not care at all about its
> public image in the field of public policy. Quite exceptional, I may add.
Could you please be more specific? For instance, from what I remember,
whenever someone
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Kate Krauss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My activist group has organized a number of strategic sign-on letters over
> the years--and used them successfully to change various policies. Rarely,
> however, does such a letter alone do the trick--but it's good as part of a
> multi
Am 17.01.2013 15:31, schrieb Maxim Kammerer:
> Could you please be more specific?
Hiring the worst "tobaccos", disrespectful communication about
competition authorities, mass-taking over standard committees by ISV,
unreasonable communication, undue interference in non-domestic nations,
bullying ta
There is no harm in taking Kate's advice to heart - they also do care, you
may perceive a complete lack of care through their
legal wrangling and maneuverings and I wouldn't suggest anyone there is a
"warm heart" about these issues - but just like Security issues and Linux
before, they care because
