[liberationtech] Thank You

2017-02-24 Thread Yosem Companys
Hi All, I want to thank all of you for the wonderful emails you have sent me and the good wishes. I also want to thank all of you who have written to me clamoring that we keep Liberationtech going independent of Stanford University. I've been swamped by emails, except this time I was both happy

Re: [liberationtech] Thank You

2017-02-24 Thread Griffin Boyce
Yosem Companys wrote: On a more serious note, I want to thank all of you for a wonderful 9 years of discussions about Liberationtech issues. Hi Yosem, Thanks for shepherding this list for 9 (!) years. I've really enjoyed the list and your moderation has been fairly hands-off, which is fairly

Re: [liberationtech] Thank You

2017-02-24 Thread Arzak Khan
Dear Yosem, You have done an awesome job and I am sure it will not end here. Thank you for your incredible superman alike support. With Gratitude, Arzak Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Wendy Dent Sent: Friday, 24 February, 12:49 Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Tha

Re: [liberationtech] Thank You

2017-02-23 Thread Wendy Dent
You did a great job. Thank you Yosem. I've always found your posts and moderation enlightening and constructive. As the new New York Times' Oscars ad says "Truth is Hard". You took it on, and helped it reach us. I'm sad to learn of the end of the LiberationTech mail list, but will be happy to

Re: [liberationtech] Thank You

2017-02-23 Thread Andreas Bader
Thanks for your work, Yosem. -Andreas Am 24.02.2017 um 01:46 schrieb Yosem Companys: > Dear List Subscribers, > > As of today, I have ceased to be a moderator of all Stanford Liberationtech > lists. > > I feel like Superman when he loses his powers, except I hope the ending is > more like this:

Re: [liberationtech] Thank You

2017-02-23 Thread Yosem Companys
I truly appreciate the kind words, Lina. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Lina Srivastava wrote: > Thank you, Yosem! > Appreciate your work. > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Yosem Companys > wrote: > >> Dear List Subscribers, >> >> As

Re: [liberationtech] Thank You

2017-02-23 Thread Lina Srivastava
Thank you, Yosem! Appreciate your work. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Yosem Companys wrote: > Dear List Subscribers, > > As of today, I have ceased to be a moderator of all Stanford > Liberationtech lists. > > I feel like Superman when he loses his powers, except I

[liberationtech] Thank you for choosing cyberpunk dystopia.

2013-07-10 Thread Eugen Leitl
https://medium.com/surveillance-state/b804de3b5b in Surveillance State14 min read Thank you for choosing cyberpunk dystopia. encryption, capitalism, and law June has been a pretty surreal month. As the Guardian and the Washington Post continue to publish internal NSA documents in what has

Re: [liberationtech] Thank you for choosing cyberpunk dystopia.

2013-07-10 Thread Spike (Chris Foote)
Thank you Shava, I so look forward to reading your posts. Spike On 10/07/2013 20:07, Shava Nerad wrote: I have to say, this is why I am proposing we must turn to traditional community organizing, using the net only as a means of totally transparent communications at this point for organizing

Re: [liberationtech] Thank you for choosing cyberpunk dystopia.

2013-07-10 Thread LilBambi
Shava you are like a breath of fresh air after dealing with the so called normal people and government idiocracy. Like Spike, I very much look forward to reading your posts. On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Spike (Chris Foote) sp...@tenbus.co.ukwrote: Thank you Shava, I so look forward to

Re: [liberationtech] Thank you for choosing cyberpunk dystopia.

2013-07-10 Thread armersuender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reading through this: I was about it remark that, while sometimes reworded, the thoughts and even sentences were ripped from talks given by Marlenspike and Appelbaum. I was very pleased to have seen the disclaimer at the end of the article. Kudos to

Re: [liberationtech] Thank you for choosing cyberpunk dystopia.

2013-07-10 Thread Evan Hanson
On 2013-07-10 17:43, Eugen Leitl wrote: https://medium.com/surveillance-state/b804de3b5b In a 1928 case before the Supreme Court, Olmstead v.United States, [...] The court ruled with the defendant This is incorrect -- the court ruled against Olmstead, and the opinions quoted in the piece are