-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013.06.29 01.18, Matt Johnson wrote:
> " Encryption meaningfully prevented a wiretap for the first time
> ever in *2012* (or so we're told, for non-intelligence domestic US
> wiretaps), and has only ever worked five times."
>
> What are you refe
Well that is good news, thanks for the pointer!
Now all we need is for the court to report what cipher and which
encryption tools were used...
--
Matt Johnson
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Eleanor Saitta wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2013.06.29 01.18, M
I really hope all your other facts are not based on this link you sent. as Matt
rightfully put it we don't know the kind of cipher that was used it could have
been a very primitive one. you are making a very bold statement based on a
very incomplete data. it is as if you are claiming that if on
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Alireza Mahdian
wrote:
> I really hope all your other facts are not based on this link you sent. as
> Matt rightfully put it we don't know the kind of cipher that was used it
> could have been a very primitive one. you are making a very bold statement
> based on a
On Jun 29, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Ali-Reza Anghaie wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Alireza Mahdian
> wrote:
>> I really hope all your other facts are not based on this link you sent. as
>> Matt rightfully put it we don't know the kind of cipher that was used it
>> could have been a very
