dear readers, hoping is of interest for the good folks here, I'm sharing with you a milestone we have reached in the DECODE European flagship research project on blockchain technologies with the succesful implementation (next week entering BETA stage) of a small, compact and free software VM that can process advanced cryptographic transformations (elliptic curve, pair based as well) expressed in human language, starting from English.
Here is a blog post about it https://decodeproject.eu/blog/smart-contracts-english-speaker here is the software https://zenroom.dyne.org We are about to make a new release this weekend and start real-world pilot experiments in cooperation with the city of Barcelona, running citizen petitions. For me this has been a fantastic journey so far, I've dedicated myself fully to writing this software for the past year and a half and with colleagues at Dyne.org we are now uncertain about claiming its the first crypto VM capable of processing human language as code. I'd be grateful to anyone providing pointers to similar efforts in teh history of distributed computing. Here below a few words on the motivation, looking forward to reactions here or in private. # For the awareness of algorithms The goal of this task is ultimately that of realizing a simple, non-technical, human-readable language for smart-rules that are actually executed in a verifiable and provable manner within the Zenroom controlled execution environment. To articulate the importance of this quest and the relevance of the results presented, which I believe to be unique in the landscape of blockchain smart-contract languages, is important to remind us of the condition in which most people find themselves when participating in the regime of truth that is built by algorithms. As the demand and production of well-connected vessels for the digital dimension has boomed, machine-readable code today functions as a literature informing the architecture in which human interactions happens and decisions are taken. The telematic condition is realised by an integrated datawork continuously engaging the observer as a participant. Such a "Gesamtdatenwerk" (Ascott, 1990) may seem an abstract architecture, yet it can be deeply binding under legal, ethical and moral circumstances. The comprehension of algorithms, the awareness of the way decisions are formulated, the implications of their execution, is not just a technical condition, but a political one, for which access to information cannot be just considered a feature, but a civil right (Pelizza and Kuhlmann, 2017). It is important to understand this in relation to the "classical" application of algorithms executed in a centralized manner, but even more in relation to distributed computing scenarios posed by blockchain technologies, which theorize a future in which rules and contracts are executed irrevocably and without requiring any human agency. The legal implications with regards to standing rights and liabilities are out of the scope here, while the focus is on ways humans, even when lacking technical literacy, can be made aware of what an algorithm does. Is it possible to establish the ground for a shared language that informs digital architects about their choices and inhabitants about the digital territory? Going past assumptions about the strong role algorithms have in governance and accountability (Diakopoulos, 2016), how can we inform digital citizens about their condition? When describing the virtualisation of economic activity in the global context, Saskia Sassen describes the need we are observing as that of an analytical vocabulary: The third component in the new geography of power is the growing importance of electronic space. There is much to be said on this issue. Here, I can isolate one particular matter: the distinctive challenge that the virtualization of a growing number of economic activities presents not only to the existing state regulatory apparatus, but also to private-sector institutions increasingly dependent on the new technologies. Taken to its extreme, this may signal a control crisis in the making, one for which we lack an analytical vocabulary.(Sassen, 1996) The analysis of legal texts and regulations here shifts into an entirely new domain; it has to refer to conditions that only algorithms can help build or destroy. Thus, referring to this theoretical framework, the research and development of a free and open source language that is intellegible to humans becomes of crucial importance and, from an ethical standing point, DECODE as many other projects in the same space cannot be exempted from addressing it. When we consider algorithms as contracts regulating relationships (between humans, between humans and nature and, nowadays more increasingly, between different contexts of nature itself) then we should adopt a representation that is close to how the human mind works and that is directly connected to the language adopted. Since algorithms are the systemic product of complex relationships between contracts and relevant choices made by standing actors (Monico, 2014), the ability to verify which algorithms are in place for a certain result to be visualised becomes very important and should be embedded in every application: to understand and communicate what algorithms and to describe and experiment their repercussions on reality. more reasoning along these lines and from many different European researchers can be read on https://AlgoSov.org ciao -- Denis "Jaromil" Roio https://Dyne.org think &do tank Ph.D, CTO & co-founder software to empower communities ✉ Haparandadam 7-A1, 1013AK Amsterdam, The Netherlands ✩ Profile and publications: https://jaromil.dyne.org 𝄞 crypto κρυπτο крипто गुप्त् 加密 האנוסים المشفره ⚷ 6113D89C A825C5CE DD02C872 73B35DA5 4ACB7D10 -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing liberationtech-ow...@lists.stanford.edu.
