On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:10:46 -0700, Zack Bass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Michael Shirley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:07:54 -0700, Zack Bass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Feds didn't go after anyone for Prostitution.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:11:37 -0700, Roy J. Tellason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 12:23, Zack Bass wrote:
The BATFE is infamous for their brutal antics that impact gun
shops(and thus your options locally). They are also fond of stings
and
informers(remember Randy
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:05:01 -0700, Valentine Michael Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone explain how the Mann Act
does not contradict the 1st amendment?
I don't think that they care about that. It's justified in
terms of the Interstate Commerce Clause.
--
Any day you
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Michael Shirley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ATF interprets law in conformance to it's institutional
prejudices. They think that the Interstate Commerce Clause covers
anything at all that they don't like. And they've got a long history
of making up
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Michael Shirley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:05:01 -0700, Valentine Michael Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone explain how the Mann Act
does not contradict the 1st amendment?
I don't think that they care
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Roy J. Tellason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wasn't the state that came in and stole from KT Ordnance...
No, but it was the County Sheriff who was able to protect him from
that, and it was the NEW County Sheriff with a different agenda who
let the
Good point. So in what way do you think the Mann Act infringes on the
First Amendment? Some kind of Free Speech or something? Do you have
a link to the wording of it?
The parts of it that I know of is unconstitutional simply because it
is VAGUE; what does an immoral purpose consist of,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Valentine Michael Smith was heard to say:
You can't do it because we say you can't.
A simple affirmation of the fact that, from the beginning, this nation
has been a nation of men not a nation of laws.
Proven by the
I have found some VERY INTERESTING information about the BATF and KT
Ordnance
(1) See http://www.ktordnance.com/kto/pdfs/USAv1911.pdf
On or about August 19, 2003, the WAKEFIELD (NEW HAMPSHIRE) POLICE
DEPARTMENT advised ATF that an individual identified as Richard Celata
owned and operated a
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:31:39 -0700, Zack Bass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Michael Shirley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:05:01 -0700, Valentine Michael Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone explain how the Mann Act
does
Nothing on the web about this case since 2006. I'll drive up to
Spring Hill and get the facts Real Soon Now.
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Zack Bass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have found some VERY INTERESTING information about the BATF and KT
Ordnance
(1) See
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Wraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:54 AM 3/11/2008, you wrote:
--- In
mailto:LibertarianEnterprise%40yahoogroups.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ahoogroups.com,
Michael Shirley
mi5ke562@ wrote:
I saw that and I'm expecting some serious blowback
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:52:41 -0400, Curt Howland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't do it because we say you can't.
A simple affirmation of the fact that, from the beginning, this nation
has been a nation of men not a nation of laws.
Proven by the fact that politicians are not prosecuted for
13 matches
Mail list logo
