--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Zack Bass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Mellony Burlison
meljb1973@ wrote:
Anarchy doesn't mean no rules, it means no rulers.
Uh-huh so I've heard. Then what's the word I'm thinking of, that
means
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Dennis Lee Wilson was heard to say:
Chaos is disorder; such as we see in governmental interference in
the market economy, pogrom, genocide and wars between states.
I contend that it requires a government to _create_ chaos.
The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed HR 1955 titled the Violent
Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. This bill is one
of the most blatant attacks against the Constitution yet and actually defines
thought crimes as homegrown terrorism. If passed into law,
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Lee Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Zack Bass zakbas@
wrote:
Then what's the word I'm thinking of, that
means the absence of enforced Rules?
That would be Self Government, Zack.
Too
It seems to have escaped the notice of these assholes that in 1789
many things, including Polygamy, Sodomy, Bestiality, Rape (even of an
adult), Horse-Theft, and Burglary were considered by the framers of
the Constitution to be properly dealt with by Capital Punishment.
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Lee Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be Self Government, Zack. It is the activity that comprises
99.9% of your daily activity, i.e. that period of time when the police
are not watching you.
Oh, you mean the times when I am
And how's that working out for you in Somalia?
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Lee Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we dealt
with our colleagues at work in the same coercive and threatening manner
by which the state insists on dealing with us, our employment would be
Well, I just read the Heller decision.
Once again, admitting a premise of the enemy eviscerated the significance
that this lawsuit could have had.
Yes -- 2nd Am is an individual right. Big whoopy do. The decision doesn't
crush ANY of the rules on the books ESPEcIALLY the noxious item of
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Lee Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should you come over to our home for a visit,
you will not be taxed, searched, required to show a passport or
driver's license, fined, jailed, threatened, handcuffed, or
prohibited from leaving. I
No Ayn Rand was prophetic.
She was the first to identify, explicitly, that granting ANY portion of a
statists premise results in a backdoor for the statist to walk thru. However,
I credit El Neil with possibly the best exposition of why the moral high ground
should be staked out in the
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Zack Bass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
Nope. What you so carefully leave out is the THREAT of punishment
after the fact by a Court. That has a wonderfully chilling effect on
the perps.
I have seen NO EVIDENCE that there is a wonderfully
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. was heard to say:
No Ayn Rand was prophetic.
She was the first to identify, explicitly, that granting ANY
portion of a statists premise results in a backdoor for the statist
to walk thru.
El Neil formulated that one beautifully. Great quote. Thanks Curt.
- Original Message -
From: Curt Howland
To: LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [LibertarianEnterprise] Re: Heller decision terrible
-BEGIN PGP
Quoting Curt Howland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. was heard to say:
What I find extraordinary if I don't need a permit for speaking why
do I need a permit for carrying?
Answer me that Supreme Court
Whose giving up. All I have pointed out is that this historic decision is
mostly laughable and won't do a whole hell of a lot because it left 19998 laws
on the books and ALL because the damn Heller attorney said that the licensing
scheme was constitutional if not capriciously or arbitrarily
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Lee Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen NO EVIDENCE that there is a
wonderfully chilling effect on ANY perps.
The Threat of being put in a Cage deters ME from lots of things. I am
sure it works for others as well. In fact, I KNOW
Curt Howland wrote:
It is moral weakness, rather than villainy, that accounts for
most of the evil in the universe -- and feeble-hearted allies, far
rather than your most powerful enemies, who are likeliest to do you
an injury you cannot recover from.
I see no reason for the from at all.
goat! wrote:
It which case wording would have been better.
Ooo Ooo! I could be a Grammar Nazi!
In which case your wording would have been better.
I swear that is what I wrote, till it zoomed away.
Goat
Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. wrote:
The Supremes would HAVE BEEN FORCED to rule on licensing if the attorney
hadn't conceded the point.
He was just doing his job well.
Goat
Quite debatable. It grants the premise of the opposition.
It's the bullshit of sue on a narrow premise.
The road to fascism is nothing but half-measures. So we took 1/2 step
backwards towards liberty. It could have been a sprint.
- Original Message -
From: goat!
To:
At 03:42 PM 6/26/2008, you wrote:
--- In
mailto:LibertarianEnterprise%40yahoogroups.comLibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com,
Robert D. Silvetz,
M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whose giving up. All I have pointed out is that this historic
decision is mostly laughable and won't do a whole
At 06:15 PM 6/26/2008, you wrote:
Robert D. Silvetz, M.D. wrote:
The Supremes would HAVE BEEN FORCED to rule on licensing if the
attorney hadn't conceded the point.
He was just doing his job well.
Goat
Keep in mind that this was a VERY split decision. If not given that
out, it could
Yes, true -- it's offensive that 4 supremes are closet fascists.
No question the El Neil Why did it have to be guns? litmus test is operative
here.
Now everyone is going to bitch about how to regulate the right... never mind
that a right is NOT supposed to be regulated.
Hopefully someone on
23 matches
Mail list logo
