I think I should point out what ought to be obvious, that in a great many cases, the use of these kits is not, in fact, an *initiation* of fraud, which would be a violation of the ZAP (zero aggression policy) which forbids the *initiation* of force, or fraud. The reason why, has to do with both the ZAP, and the idiotic culture which exists in Egypt and other such countries. The ZAP proscribes the initiation of force or fraud, or the THREAT of initiation of force or fraud. It does NOT proscribe the use of force or fraud as a *response*, once someone else has used, or threatened to use, force or fraud. Now, the culture in Egypt and other such countries is such, that a woman who has sex outside marriage, if this is found out, will have force initiated against HER, which is, in fact, a violation of the ZAP. To be specific, she will be killed, if not be her present or future husband, than by a mob led by self-appointed mullahs. And this will happen regardless of whether she is married, single, or chooses to get married in the future. The fact that a woman chooses to have sex does not violate the rights of anyone else, regardless of what the mullahs or other idiots in such countries think. Since a woman can expect, in such countries, to be killed if this is discovered, the *initiation* of a threat of violence against her is pretty much a given. Therefore, such kits, although a fraud, are not an INITIATION of fraud. They are a use of fraud in response to a previously existing threat of an initiation of force, and the use of such kits to prevent herself from being killed is no more a violation of the ZAP than it would be for such a woman to suddenly pull out a machine gun on a mullah-led mob threatening to stone her to death.
