-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marc,
Marc Lehmann wrote:
> a) it doesn't support cname-to-cname (which is illegal, but unfortunately,
>with google relying on it, there is little to do) - so cname resolution
>has to be done manually (which is possible).
cname-to-cname is
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:39:40PM +0100, "W.C.A. Wijngaards"
wrote:
> cname-to-cname is legal (RFC1034) says 'fairly long chains' are legal.
rfc1034 says no such thing (I just searched it).
rfc1034 explicitly says that cnames are not allowed to point to other cnames:
A CNAME RR identifies
