On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:09:26PM +0200, Zsbán Ambrus
wrote:
> > That breaks existing applications, so, no.
>
> The problem is what happens if you want to use a child watcher to wait
> on a child process that exits before you have started any child
> watcher, right?
That's the reason that some
On 5/23/12, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:21:35PM +0400, Denis Bilenko
> wrote:
>> The patch below defers installing SIGCHLD until the first child
>> watcher is started. Thus, if an application does not use child
>> watchers, libev never installs a SIGCHLD handler.
>
> That bre
Hi Jonathan,
On 2012-05-22, at 3:47 PM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:32:35PM -0400, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré wrote:
>> 1) Can I assume that if the recv return zero mean that the client have been
>> disconnected?
>
> Yes, that's what the manpage states:
> "The return value
