Re: glibc 2.9

2012-06-22 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:51:51AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > It does, but in the new kernels (which is what i use) that call is > essentially being phased out. i.e. if i happen to compile with I really don't believe that, that would be a first. > EPOLL_CLOEXEC I get epoll_create1(EPOLL_C

Re: glibc 2.9

2012-06-22 Thread Jamal Hadi Salim
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 13:09 +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > The kernel should return einval if it doesn't understand that flag > (but this is about libc, not kernel version, right?). Even if the > kernel silently ignores the flag, libev will just set it again as with > epoll_create. It does, but in

Re: glibc 2.9

2012-06-22 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:53:21PM -0400, jamal wrote: > > I would be interested to learn under which conditions the availibility of > > epoll_create1 and/or EPOLL_CLOEXEC is an actually measurable optimisation, > > as opposed to being a correctness issue. > > I dont have any numbers. > More that