Hi,
On 02/20/2013 06:16 PM, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:28:57PM +0100, Alexander Klauer
wrote:
semantics as a call to free(ptr). A C89-conformant implementation may
return a unique non-NULL pointer which may be safely passed to
free().
And when does this happen *in libev*?
D'oh, will I ever get it right? Find the correct version of libev.c
attached.
Best regards,
Alexander
#include
#include
#include
static void * allocator( void * ptr, long size ) {
assert( ( size >= 0 ) && ( ( unsigned long ) size <= ( size_t ) -1 ) );
return realloc( ptr, size );
}
int main
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:39:20AM +0100, Alexander Klauer
wrote:
> 1. if size is equal to zero, and ptr is
> not NULL, then the call is equivalent to free(ptr)."
> The last assertion is incorrect. See 4. for a proof on concept in
> libev below.
That assertion was correct until reletively recent
