On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 01:12:21PM +0100, Luca Barbato
wrote:
> > Why would I? It's not my job to educate gentoo. They can break programs
> > and make life harder for its users as much as they want.
>
> Had you spent enough time to follow the link
> you wouldn't have made an ass out of yourself.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:58:31AM -0600, Dan White wrote:
> I respect your decisions with libev. However, I ask you to consider
> that others on this list of different motivations as users of libev than
> you do as a developer of it.
Sure, but that still doesn't mean they can troll - the list of
On 03/09/13 11:55 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Given the sad state of affirs w.r.t. the pkg-config discussions, please
refrain from discussing this topic unless:
- you really have an argument that hasn't been refuted yet.
- you really show evidence, or an explanation, on why your argument is true.
On 09/03/13 11:48, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:50:31AM +0100, Luca Barbato
> wrote:
>>> If "you" are gentoo and you add patches like that, potentially breaking
>>> compatibility with other distributions and upstream, then you are simply
>>> doing it wrong.
>>
>> Feel free to
Given the sad state of affirs w.r.t. the pkg-config discussions, please
refrain from discussing this topic unless:
- you really have an argument that hasn't been refuted yet.
- you really show evidence, or an explanation, on why your argument is true.
- if you think a previously refuted argument i
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:14:44AM -0600, Dan White wrote:
> >Well, since pkg-config would fail in your described scenario (libev
> >installed in a non-standard location means pkg-config will not find it
> >either...), I am not sure what this is an argument for.
>
> It would not fail,
Don't get
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:50:31AM +0100, Luca Barbato
wrote:
> > If "you" are gentoo and you add patches like that, potentially breaking
> > compatibility with other distributions and upstream, then you are simply
> > doing it wrong.
>
> Feel free to discuss about it here
Why would I? It's not
