On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:38:15PM +0100, Thorsten Lück
wrote:
> void operator() (EV_P_ ev_io &w, int revents)
the documented syntax for operator () would be this, taken straight from
the example for the set (object *) method:
void operator() (ev::io &w, int revents)
--
Hi Thorsten,
On 11/18/2015 05:38 PM, Thorsten Lück wrote:
struct udp_client
{
void operator() (EV_P_ ev_io &w, int revents)
{
}
};
Does anybody has an idea what I am doing wrong?
have you tried without the loop (EV_P_) in the signature?
Take care,
Alexander
--
Dr. Alexander K
Hi @all,
I want to write a small embedded application listing on UDP. It is
compiling using the C-Api but not using the C++-Api. In both cases I am
using the gnu g++ compiler:
> $ /opt/crosstool-ng-powerpc/bin/powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe-g++ --version
> powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe-g++ (cro
于 2012年05月03日 21:27, Marc Lehmann 写道:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, 马承珂 wrote:
Did you use the "-Wall" option? I just write a very easy sample code to test
this on Ubuntu12.04 with g++4.6.3.
You said you get it with -O2, and I disagreed, which apparently turned out
to be true. -Wa
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:45:30AM +0800, 马承珂 wrote:
> Did you use the "-Wall" option? I just write a very easy sample code to test
> this on Ubuntu12.04 with g++4.6.3.
You said you get it with -O2, and I disagreed, which apparently turned out
to be true. -Wall != -O2.
--
The c
Did you use the "-Wall" option? I just write a very easy sample code to test
this on Ubuntu12.04 with g++4.6.3.
ev_o2.cpp:
#include "ev.h"
ev_io myev;
void on_read(struct ev_loop *loop, ev_io *watcher, int events) { }
int main()
{
ev_io_init(&myev, on_read, 0, EV_READ);
return 0;
}
then u
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:11:17PM +0800, 马承珂 wrote:
> At 2012-04-19 15:35:46,"Marc Lehmann" wrote:
> >As an additional info-let: current versions of gcc (at least 4.4+) don't
> >emit any warnings when compiled with -O2, except in the CVS version, and
> >there is a bug open in gcc for that one, a
At 2012-04-19 15:35:46,"Marc Lehmann" wrote:
>As an additional info-let: current versions of gcc (at least 4.4+) don't
>emit any warnings when compiled with -O2, except in the CVS version, and
>there is a bug open in gcc for that one, as it shouldn't warn.
Sorry, I mean g++ when saying gcc, I am
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 08:37:53AM +0800, Echo wrote:
> i am using libev c API in c++ on Linux both 32 and 64 bit, it works great for
> two years. There are a few compiler warnings when using gcc with O2 option,
> just ignore them, it doesn't matter.
As an additional info-let: cu
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02:35AM -0400, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré
wrote:
> On 2012-04-18, at 1:33 AM, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 04:18:13PM -0400, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré
> > wrote:
> >> I'm new to libev and want to know if the C++ API
i am using libev c API in c++ on Linux both 32 and 64 bit, it works great for
two years. There are a few compiler warnings when using gcc with O2 option,
just ignore them, it doesn't matter.
发自我的 iPhone
在 2012-4-18，23:02，Kevyn-Alexandre Paré 写道：
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thx for havin
Hi Marc,
Thx for having made & share such library!
On 2012-04-18, at 1:33 AM, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 04:18:13PM -0400, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré
> wrote:
>> I'm new to libev and want to know if the C++ API is equivalent to the C API?
>
> For wh
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 04:18:13PM -0400, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré
wrote:
> I'm new to libev and want to know if the C++ API is equivalent to the C API?
For what definition of equivalent?
> That made me wonder what was the latest update on what was supported and not
> supported wi
Hi,
I'm new to libev and want to know if the C++ API is equivalent to the C API? I
have seen in the mailing list some discussion between Marc & Leandro saying OLD
stuff :
http://lists.schmorp.de/pipermail/libev/2008q4/000450.html
That made me wonder what was the latest update on
As I said, I probably won't do it, but here is a wrapper that converts
the callback/data combination into a object */method * combo:
This class can be used for all wrapper functions (but only for non-const
objects, due to the horribly useless const semantics in C++, you need a
separate set of wrap
15 matches
Mail list logo
