On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:50:20AM +0800, adream wrote:
> It seems that ev_loop_fork didn't work as expected.
> Am I misunderstand the document?
Possibly - how _are_ you understanding it? :)
> So, can any guys shows me an example which would have different
> behavior if I call the ev_loop_fork o
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:22:15PM +0800, adream wrote:
> hi
> I thought, if I didn't call the ev_loop_fork in the child, then the
> watcher in child wouldn't be triggered.
ev_loop_fork (or EVFLAG_FORKCHECK) are required for the event loop to
survive a fork. they don't do anything else.
not
It seems that ev_loop_fork didn't work as expected.
Am I misunderstand the document?
So, can any guys shows me an example which would have different
behavior if I call the ev_loop_fork or not?
Thanks
Looking forward for any useful advice.
2016-02-24 21:22 GMT+08:00, adream :
> hi
> I thought,
hi
I thought, if I didn't call the ev_loop_fork in the child, then the
watcher in child wouldn't be triggered.
This is my code, I build the ev_loop with EVBACKEND_EPOLL and
EVFLAG_NOENV flags, so there is no EVFLAG_FORKCHECK flag, then I comment
the ev_loop_fork call in the child. if everyt
