On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:12:08AM -0800, Tani Hosokawa wrote:
These are four broken functions that didn't make it into the latest
release -- I noticed that one of them is even marked as not being
thread-safe.
Thanks! I've checked your patch into trunk and into the 1.4 branch.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:54:41AM +0300, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
Tani Hosokawa ?:
snip
significant amount of processing to do per request. The reason I put
1024 in there is all implementations that I know of silently truncate
the backlog parameter to the system's maximum. The reason I
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Tani Hosokawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under high load, unless you build a dedicated acceptor thread you will
find that only allowing a listen backlog of 10 connections will cause
lots of attempted connections to simply be dropped if you have any
Hi,
while looking into an async dns solution i found the code to recheck
dns servers in libevent. I dont think checking for google.com is a very
good choice. In the past even ccTLDs have disappeared or start to
disappear (.su, .dd, .yu) despite companys renaming, disappearing or
having hicups.
