On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 09:16 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:42:47AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> [...]
> > I do realize that this breaks existing assumptions about return values.
> > What if instead of using a different return value, we don't reset
> > base->event_gotte
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:42:47AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
[...]
> I do realize that this breaks existing assumptions about return values.
> What if instead of using a different return value, we don't reset
> base->event_gotterm and base->event_break when triggered? We can reset
> them at the
