= evbuffer_read(rbuf, fd, BUFSIZ);
-
Of course you could use bufferevents instead of direct calls
to evbuffer_read/write.
cheers,
jamal
diff --git a/buffer.c b/buffer.c
index e66080f..6032cad 100644
--- a/buffer.c
+++ b/buffer.c
@@ -341,16 +341,28 @@ evbuffer_drain(struct evbuffer *buf
openssl is because it can do DTLS and there are
experimental patches for SCTP. Ive never looked at NSS, but i glanced
briefly at GNUTLS and it didnt meet my requirements.
cheers,
jamal
___
Libevent-users mailing list
Libevent-users@monkey.org
http
is still
there - so i will migrate to 2.0 and then send a patch after playing
with it for a bit.
cheers,
jamal
___
Libevent-users mailing list
Libevent-users@monkey.org
http://monkeymail.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
the one stop shop for all protocols
(like python twisted)?
I know i dont have to use or compile all the goodies, but
would it not make more sense to keep the protocol processing
engines as a separate library that uses libevent (or for
that matter whatever the competition is)?
cheers,
jamal
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 11:13 -0500, jamal wrote:
I hope i come out sound patronizing or putting down the good
work done in libevent.
Sorry: I meant quiet the opposite ;-
i.e hope i dont come out sounding patronizing.
cheers,
jamal
___
Libevent-users
