Re: [Libevent-users] FYI: libevent/libev benchmark updated for libevent-1.4.3

2008-05-08 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:05:20PM -0500, Dan wrote: > > > Its to bad when people write emails like this, clearly no social skills. Dan, please take this off-list. This kind of flamewar does not help libevent, libev, or anybody. yrs, -- Nick ___ Lib

Re: [Libevent-users] FYI: libevent/libev benchmark updated for libevent-1.4.3

2008-05-08 Thread Dan
Its to bad when people write emails like this, clearly no social skills. Yeah I suggested I was a noob just to see if he was an asshole, and guess what! :) Have a couple emails as well of him making personal attacks against my family and such, its really to bad, I feel sorry for him, but I'll

Re: [Libevent-users] FYI: libevent/libev benchmark updated for libevent-1.4.3

2008-05-07 Thread Dan
Think I tried Ev once, to many bugs, hell couldn't even set a timer within a timer as I remember, This EV stuff just meant to undermine the hardwork of the folks at libevent? Dan. On Wed, 7 May 2008, Marc Lehmann wrote: As version 1.4.3-stable of libevent uses a more efficient binary h

[Libevent-users] FYI: libevent/libev benchmark updated for libevent-1.4.3

2008-05-07 Thread Marc Lehmann
As version 1.4.3-stable of libevent uses a more efficient binary heap over the red-black tree used before, the benchmark at: http://libev.schmorp.de/bench.html was quite outdated. I therefore updated it by benchmarking libev-3.31 vs. libevent-1.4.3. The main difference is that the growth chara