On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:28:17AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/23/22 00:05, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:35:03PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> Previously the macros used __LINE__ which meant they created a unique
> >> name specific to the line on which the macro
On 02/23/22 00:05, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:35:03PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Previously the macros used __LINE__ which meant they created a unique
>> name specific to the line on which the macro was expanded. This
>> worked to a limited degree for cases like:
>>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:35:03PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Previously the macros used __LINE__ which meant they created a unique
> name specific to the line on which the macro was expanded. This
> worked to a limited degree for cases like:
>
> #define FOO \
> ({ int
Previously the macros used __LINE__ which meant they created a unique
name specific to the line on which the macro was expanded. This
worked to a limited degree for cases like:
#define FOO \
({ int NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME(foo) = 42; \
NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME(foo) * 2 })
since the “FOO”
