On 6/12/23 20:10, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> [Bah - I typed up a longer response, but lost it when accidentally
>> trying to send through the wrong SMTP server, so now I have to
>> remember what I had...]
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at
On 6/9/23 22:39, Eric Blake wrote:
> [Bah - I typed up a longer response, but lost it when accidentally
> trying to send through the wrong SMTP server, so now I have to
> remember what I had...]
>
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:45:56PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 6/9/23 04:17, Eric Blake
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> [Bah - I typed up a longer response, but lost it when accidentally
> trying to send through the wrong SMTP server, so now I have to
> remember what I had...]
>
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:45:56PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On
[Bah - I typed up a longer response, but lost it when accidentally
trying to send through the wrong SMTP server, so now I have to
remember what I had...]
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:45:56PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 6/9/23 04:17, Eric Blake wrote:
> > When I added structured replies to the
On 6/9/23 04:17, Eric Blake wrote:
> When I added structured replies to the NBD spec, I intentionally chose
> a wire layout where the magic number and cookie overlap, even while
> the middle member changes from uint32_t error to the pair uint16_t
> flags and type. Based only on a strict reading
When I added structured replies to the NBD spec, I intentionally chose
a wire layout where the magic number and cookie overlap, even while
the middle member changes from uint32_t error to the pair uint16_t
flags and type. Based only on a strict reading of C rules on
effective types and compatible