On 02/22/22 15:41, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:49:13PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/21/22 23:00, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> We were previously enforcing minimum block size with EINVAL for
>>> too-small requests. Advertise this to the client.
>>> ---
>>> filters/swab/nbdkit-sw
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:49:13PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/21/22 23:00, Eric Blake wrote:
> > We were previously enforcing minimum block size with EINVAL for
> > too-small requests. Advertise this to the client.
> > ---
> > filters/swab/nbdkit-swab-filter.pod | 6 ++
> > filters/s
On 02/21/22 23:00, Eric Blake wrote:
> We were previously enforcing minimum block size with EINVAL for
> too-small requests. Advertise this to the client.
> ---
> filters/swab/nbdkit-swab-filter.pod | 6 ++
> filters/swab/swab.c | 24 +++-
> 2 files change
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 04:00:11PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> We were previously enforcing minimum block size with EINVAL for
> too-small requests. Advertise this to the client.
> ---
> filters/swab/nbdkit-swab-filter.pod | 6 ++
> filters/swab/swab.c | 24 +++
We were previously enforcing minimum block size with EINVAL for
too-small requests. Advertise this to the client.
---
filters/swab/nbdkit-swab-filter.pod | 6 ++
filters/swab/swab.c | 24 +++-
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/